Earlier this year, Amy Shipley wrote an article for the Washington Post in which she claimed that track and field is experiencing a resurgence in popularity as a spectator sport. Among other evidence, she cited increased attendance.
I immediately questioned that statement. A few individual meets may have experienced increased attendance this year, most notably the Penn Relays. But on the whole we don’t know whether it is going up or down or neither, because there is no centralized accounting of attendance at domestic track meets. I took it upon myself to do so. I would estimate I sent several hundred e-mails to various journalists, coaches, ticket offices, finance directors and grad-assistant SIDs over the last few months to try to pin down attendance at various meets. Often I got no response at all, but most were quite helpful and sent me the information I needed.
The diversity of the sport makes compiling the information a challenge. Some meets announce their attendance and some do not. Some record the number of tickets sold and some only make estimates. Some meets are on a single day and others are over several days; some keep separate attendance figures for each day and others lump them all together.
Also, it's not always easy to determine what "attendance" is. The Oregonian's Ken Goe, who always mentions attendance in his articles, notes that "official attendance figures usually are tickets-distributed figures, meaning the count includes anybody in the stadium, including athletes, media members, officials, coaches, concession workers, security officers, etc."
I classified meets into four categories: professional, college, high school, and relay carnivals. Many meets combine one or more of these, but the meet was assigned to the group which it primarily serves. Regardless of what it calls itself, a meet is a “relay carnival” if it serves all of the above, mixed together on the same day.
Attendance is suffixed with an “e” if the number is an estimate, and a “w” if inclement weather negatively impacted attendance.
The Numbers
All known single-day attendances of 4,000 or more
Attendance | Meet | Site | Date | Capacity | Pct |
54,310 | Penn Relays (day 3) | April 24 | 52,593 | 103% | |
38,904 | Penn Relays (day 2) | April 23 | 52,593 | 74% | |
24,132 | Penn Relays (day 1) | April 22 | 52,593 | 46% | |
21,000e | Texas Relays (day 2) | April 3 | 22,000 | 95% | |
19,770e | UIL Championships (day 2) | May 15 | 22,000 | 90% | |
16,300e | UIL Championships (day 1) | May 14 | 22,000 | 74% | |
14,932 | IHSAA Championships (day 2) | May 21 | 14,557 | 103% | |
14,504 | Drake Relays (day 3) | April 24 | 14,557 | 100% | |
14,000e | Texas Relays (day 1) | April 2 | 22,000 | 64% | |
14,000e | IHSAA Championships (day 3) | May 22 | 14,557 | 96% | |
13,000e | Kansas Relays (day 2) | April 17 | 50,071 | 26% | |
12,872 | adidas Grand Prix | June 12 | 10,000 | 129% | |
12,834 | Prefontaine Classic | July 3 | 12,500 | 103% | |
12,812 | NCAA D-I Outdoor Championships (day 4) | June 12 | 12,000 | 107% | |
12,772 | OHSAA Championships (day 2) | June 5 | 10,000 | 128% | |
12,503 | OHSAA Championships (day 1) | June 4 | 10,000 | 125% | |
12,053 | IHSAA Championships (day 1) | May 20 | 14,557 | 83% | |
11,972 | NCAA D-I Outdoor Championships (day 3) | June 11 | 12,000 | 100% | |
11,510 | Millrose Games | January 29 | 18,200 | 63% | |
11,172 | NCAA D-I Outdoor Championships (day 2) | June 10 | 12,000 | 93% | |
10,013 | Drake Relays (day 2) | April 23 | 14,557 | 69% | |
9,891 | NCAA D-I Outdoor Championships (day 1) | June 9 | 12,000 | 82% | |
9,837 | OSAA 4A/5A/6A Championships (day 1) | May 28 | 10,500 | 94% | |
9,572 | CIF Championships (day 2) | June 5 | 13,000 | 74% | |
9,024 | USATF Championships (day 3) | June 26 | 14,557 | 62% | |
8,463 | USATF Championships (day 2) | June 25 | 14,557 | 58% | |
7,786 | CIF Championships (day 1) | June 4 | 13,000 | 60% | |
7,715 | OSAA 4A/5A/6A Championships (day 2) | May 29 | 10,500 | 73% | |
7,437 | USATF Championships (day 4) | June 27 | 14,557 | 51% | |
7,124 | USATF Championships (day 1) | June 24 | 14,557 | 49% | |
7,036 | Oregon Relays (day 2) | May 1 | 10,500 | 67% | |
6,732 | Oregon Relays (day 1) | April 30 | 10,500 | 64% | |
6,118 | May 8 | 10,500 | 58% | ||
5,918 | March 21 | 10,500 | 56% | ||
5,769 | Drake Relays | April 22 | 14,557 | 40% | |
5,700e | Jesse Owens Classic | May 1 | 10,000 | 57% | |
5,475 | NCAA D-I Indoor Championships (day 2) | March 13 | 5,500 | 100% | |
5,321 | Pepsi Team Challenge | April 10 | 10,500 | 51% | |
5,209 | Men of | April 17 | 10,500 | 50% | |
4,904 | USC at UCLA | May 1 | 11,700 | 42% | |
4,500e | MHSAA LP D-1 Championships | Junes 5 | |||
4,500e | MHSAA LP D-2 Championships | June 5 | |||
4,484 | IHSAA Boys' Championships | June 5 | 6,200 | 72% | |
4,000e | February 6 | 3,500 | 114% |
All known total attendances greater than 6,000
Attendance | Meet | Site | Days |
117,346 | Penn Relays | 3 | |
45,847 | NCAA D-I Outdoor Championships | 4 | |
41,000e | IHSAA Championships | 3 | |
36,070e | UIL Championships | 2 | |
35,000e | 2 | ||
32,048 | USATF Championships | 4 | |
30,266 | Drake Relays | 3 | |
25,275 | OHSAA Championships | 2 | |
25,000e | NSAA Championships | 2 | |
17,552 | OSAA 4A/5A/6A Championships | 2 | |
17,358 | CIF Championships | 2 | |
16,000e | 2 | ||
13,768 | 2 | ||
12,872 | adidas Grand Prix | 1 | |
12,834 | Prefontaine Classic | 1 | |
11,510 | Millrose Games | 1 | |
10,816 | MSHSL Championships | 2 | |
9,900e | UHSAA Championships | 2 | |
9,489 | NMAA Championships | 4 | |
8,708 | NCAA D-I Indoor Championships | 2 | |
8,525 | FHSAA Championships | 4 | |
8,435 | IHSAA Championships | 2 | |
7,565 | OSAA 1A/2A/3A Championships | 2 | |
7,500e | AIA Championships | 3 | |
7,000e | New Balance Nationals | 3 | |
6,909 | Walnut, CA | 4 | |
6,118 | 1 |
Subdivided By Meet Type
Professionals
Attendance | Meet | Site | Date |
12,872* | adidas Grand Prix | June 12 | |
12,834* | Prefontaine Classic | July 3 | |
11,510 | Millrose Games | January 29 | |
9,024 | USATF Championships | June 26 | |
8,463 | USATF Championships | June 25 | |
7,437 | USATF Championships | June 27 | |
7,124 | USATF Championships | June 24 | |
4,000e* | February 6 | ||
3,150* | USATF Indoor Championships | February 28 | |
1,000e | May 29 |
Colleges
National Championships
Attendance | Meet | Site | Date |
12,812* | NCAA Outdoor Championships (day 4) | June 12 | |
11,972* | NCAA Outdoor Championships (day 3) | June 11 | |
11,172 | NCAA Outdoor Championships (day 2) | June 10 | |
9,891 | NCAA Outdoor Championships (day 1) | June 9 | |
5,475* | NCAA Indoor Championships (day 2) | March 13 | |
3,233 | NCAA Indoor Championships (day 1) | March 12 | |
2,939 | NCAA Cross Country Championships | Nov. 23 | |
1,798 | NCAA West Preliminary Round (day 3) | May 29 | |
1,328 | NCAA West Preliminary Round (day 2) | May 28 | |
1,092 | NCAA West Preliminary Round (day 1) | May 27 |
* = sellout
Conference Championships (final day only)
notable missing data: Big 12, SEC outdoor championships
All known data is listed
Attendance | Meet | Site | Date |
2,500e | Heps Championships | May 9 | |
2,500e | IC4A/ECAC Championships | May 16 | |
2,038 | Pacific-10 Championships | May 16 | |
1,454 | Big Ten Men's Indoor Championships | Feb, 28 | |
1,107 | Big Ten Championships | May 16 | |
1,100e | Southland Championships | May 16 | |
1,000e | ACC Championships | April 17 | |
1,000e | MPSF (indoor) Championships | Feb. 27 | |
900e | Southland Championships | May 15 | |
631 | Big Ten Women's Indoor | Feb. 28 | |
546w | Big East Championships | May 15 | |
532 | Mid-American Championships | May 15 | |
426 | Mountain West Championships | May 15 | |
398 | Big Sky Championships | May 15 | |
386 | Atlantic Sun Championships | May 15 |
Regular Season
All known data is listed
6,118 | May 8 | ||
5,918 | March 21 | ||
5,700e | Jesse Owens Classic | May 1 | |
5,321 | Pepsi Team Challenge | April 10 | |
5,209 | Men of | April 17 | |
4,904 | USC at UCLA | May 1 | |
2,500e | Husky Classic | Feb. 13 | |
2,100e | April 3 | ||
850e | The Big Meet | April 10 | |
850e | Brutus Hamilton Invitational | April 24 | |
800e | Jan. 16 | ||
600e | Sea Ray Relays (final day) | April 10 | |
482 | May 1 | ||
300ew | May 1 | ||
300ew | Cougar Invitational | May 24 | |
300e | Sea Ray Relays (first day) | April 9 | |
55 | April 17 |
High Schools
State Championships
Making comparisons between attendance at various state championships is difficult as there is a wide variety of formats. Some have many divisions, some (like California) have just one. Most are held over two days but others are held over three or four days. Some (such as Texas) hold all their divisions simultaneously; some (such as Ohio) hold them in succession; some (such as Michigan) hold them at separate sites, and some (such as Oregon) don’t hold them all on the same weekend. Below are the total attendances I have received, with notations as to format.
41,000e | IHSAA Championships | 3 days, 4 divisions | |
36,070e | UIL Championships | 2 days, 5 divisions | |
25,275 | OHSAA Championships | 2 days, 3 divisions | |
25,117 | OSAA Championships | Eugene/Monmouth, OR | 6 divisions, 4 days over 2 weekends |
25,000e | NSAA Championships | 2 days, 4 divisions | |
17,358 | CIF Championships | 2 days, 1 division | |
14,500e | MHSAA Championships | 4 sites | 2 days, 4 divisions |
10,816 | MSHSL Championships | 2 days, 2 divisions | |
9,900e | UHSAA Championships | 2 days, 5 divisions | |
9,489 | NMAA Championships | 2 days, 5 divisions | |
8,525 | FHSAA Championships | 4 days, 4 divisions | |
8,435 | IHSAA Championships | 2 days, 1 division | |
7,500e | AIA Championships | 3 days, 5 divisions | |
5,567 | NCHSAA Championships | 3 days, 3 divisions | |
4,723 | MPSSAA Championships | 3 days, 4 divisions | |
4,600e | KSHSAA Championships | 2 days, 6 divisions |
Invitationals
I was able to get attendance numbers from a few post-season elite invitationals.
7,000e | New Balance Nationals | June 17-19 | |
4,000e | Nike Team Nationals | July 2 | |
1,800e | Great Southwest Classic | June 5 | |
1,410 | Lisle, IL | June 12 | |
1,000e | Golden South Classic | May 29 |
Relay Carnivals
Top multi-day attendances
117,346 | Penn Relays | 3 days | |
35,000e | 2 days | ||
30,266 | Drake Relays | 3 days | |
16,000e | 2 days | ||
13,768 | 2 days | ||
6,909 | Walnut, CA | 3 days | |
3,600ew | 2 days (2nd day canceled after 4 events due to severe weather) | ||
3,100e | 2 days | ||
2,675e | Sun Angel Classic | 2 days |
Top single-day attendances
(no individual-day breakdown from Mt. SAC, Texas Southern, Sun Angel or Florida)
54,310* | Penn Relays, day 3 | April 24 | |
38,904 | Penn Relays, day 2 | April 23 | |
24,132 | Penn Relays, day 1 | April 22 | |
21,000e | April 3 | ||
14,504* | Drake Relays, day 3 | April 24 | |
14,000e | April 2 | ||
13,000e | April 17 | ||
10,013 | Drake Relays, day 2 | April 23 | |
7,036 | May 1 | ||
6,732 | April 30 | ||
5,769 | Drake Relays, day 1 | April 22 | |
3,000e | April 16 |
Analysis
Trends. The point of this data collection is to report data so it can be tracked over several years. The largest meets, however, have kept attendance data in the past.
Meet | 2010 | 4-year avg | Change |
adidas Grand Prix | 12,872 | 6,248 | +106% |
NCAA Championships | 45,847 | 29,682 | +54% |
USATF Championships | 32,048 | 30,050* | +7% |
Penn Relays | 117,346 | 112,185 | +5% |
Drake Relays | 30,286 | 30,322 | level |
Prefontaine Classic | 12,834 | 13,409 | -4% |
Millrose Games | 11,510 | 13,766 | -15% |
The USATF Championships were compared only to 2006, the last year without a Worlds or Olympics. Despite extreme heat on a few days, the attendance grew at a modest rate.
College track is by far the weakest. The NCAA Championships did set a record for total attendance, but largely that was due to its location in Eugene. “Track Town USA” had both men’s and women’s teams with championship aspirations, and so it’s hardly surprising that multiple days sold out. Other meets in Eugene were well-attended. After that, besides the NCAA indoor and cross-country championships, only three campuses had meets well beyond the 2,000 mark.
The weakness of conference championships was particularly surprising, although a number of factors undoubtedly played a role. Many were held in terrible weather. Also, as conference championships tend to rotate from institution to institution, some colleges have built somewhat of a fan base and others have not. Weak attendance for the Pac-10 and strong attendance for the Heps, IC4A, and the Big Ten men’s indoor championships were likely related to the host’s competitive strength and/or effort to build a fan base.
But, by and large, college meets are poorly attended because it’s not a priority of those who organize them. Brent Hoover, who runs the great HepsTrack.com site, said “For the most part, college track meets have become insular endeavors, designed only by coaches who often see a very narrow view of the sport. They would do well to take a much larger view of the health of the sport, but that requires some risk.”
High schools are our savior. Over the last few decades, leadership has fiddled while our sport burned. USATF gets the lion’s share of the blame for this, but I think there’s plenty to go around. Yet we’re still here and doing OK because our grass-roots are so strong. What exactly makes high school track so appealing to spectators is open to debate; you can cite community ties, ubiquitous team scoring, or relatively tightly-scheduled running events. Regardless, when Penn Relays director Dave Johnson said of Philadelphia that “high school track in this area is big, and good, and most track fans would be found at those meets”, he could have been talking about anywhere.
A criticism that seems strange is to say that most state championship attendees won’t ever come to another track meet. This would be like downplaying the Super Bowl because most people who watch it won’t watch any other football game. It’s true, but it doesn’t change its popularity. But also, state championships are an opportunity to introduce people to the sport--it is where I became hooked for life.
Relay carnivals are where it’s at. Dr. Norbert Sander, director of New York’s Armory Track & Field Center, knows this. In an editorial for Track & Field News, he wrote “We should try to bring these three groupings: high school, college, professional, on occasion, under one competitive roof. Show high schoolers what collegians are doing and show the pros what the collegians are accomplishing.”
Conclusion
Two competing adages should be kept in mind. The first is “what gets measured gets managed”. By knowing attendance and paying attention to it, hopefully we can get it to rise. The second is “you can’t fatten a pig by weighing it”, meaning that increasing attendance will require a lot of hard work and a change in priorities from athletes to spectators.
No comments:
Post a Comment